How to tell if someone is a Christian?

I came across this video on YouTube, which features seven people who claim to be Christians in conversation.

The point is that only six are professing Christians and one is an atheist masquerading as a Christian. Through questions, the participants try to guess who is the imposter and vote them out. It is an interesting exercise.

Personally, I have some doubts about the credibility of some of the others who claim to be Christians as well, but that's beside the point.

Of more interest is to ask, how would we try to determine if somone claiming to be a Christian is genuine?

I don't think the questions asked in the video were very good. No one seemed to ask or talk about God at all. No one mentioned Jesus or the Holy Spirit. No one referred to prayer or Bible reading. At least not in the edited version we see in the video.

These are the kind of questions I would probably ask in this scenario:

• What led you to become a Christian?
• What kind of church do you attend?
• What Bible translation do you mostly read?
• What's your favourite Bible verse?
• What's your favourite hymn or worship song?
• Do you serve in any capacity at your church?

Of course, someone deliberately setting out to deceive could probably come up with answers to these, so who knows. In my experience, most Christians are very willing to accept someone's profession of faith as genuine.

More important than our personal "tests" is to see what the Bible says about what makes a Christian. Some relevant verses are the following:

• A Christian is someone who has been born again by the Holy Spirit. The phrase "born-again Christian" is a redundancy. See John 3:3-8.
• A Christian is someone who has faith in Jesus to save them. See Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16
  
• A Christian is someone who seeks to follow Jesus in obedience to his teachings. See 1 John 2:3-6.
• A Christian is someone who confesses that Jesus is Lord and believes that God raised him from the dead. See Romans 10:9
• A Christian is someone who seeks to turn away (repent) of their sins. See Matthew 3:2, Mark 1:15, Acts 2:38, 2 Peter 3:9.

The folk in this video seem to associate being a Christian with going to church and maybe having some kind of spiritual experience. I was quite shocked that none of them mentioned a personal relationship with Jesus or God the Father or the Holy Spirit.

Apologetics: the Battle for Hearts as well as Minds

There's an interesting guest post on Scot McKnight's blog Jesus Creed from Jeff Cook. You can read it here. Cook makes the point that too often Christian apologists think that all they have to do is win the rational argument against atheists to attract people to the faith. In debates, atheists often seem more persuasive because of the emotional strength of their argument.

Cook suggests it is high time the Christian side considered how important the emotional component of persuading the undecided is. Unless we paint an attractive and desirable portrait of the God we are inviting people to believe in, for most people they won't care how good our rational arguments are.

I think he makes a very valid point.

The Dawkins Letters

The Dawkins Letters: Challenging Atheist Myths
David Robertson
Christian Focus Publications 2007

I borrowed a copy of this short book from the local library. It is actually a series of open letters from David Robertson (a minister of the Free Church of Scotland in Dundee) to Richard Dawkins about Dawkins' book The God Delusion.

It is amazing how reviews of this book and others like it - and Dawkins' own book to be fair - on places like Amazon are almost all sharply divided down Christian/Atheist lines. Perhaps that should not surprise me, but it does. Basically, atheists seem to love Dawkins' book and hate Robertson's book. And vice versa for Christians.

Well as a Christian, I liked Robertson's book. I thought in the ten letters he succeeded in the most important point, which is pointing out that atheism is primarily a philosophical and not a scientific position. Dawkins' position is in the end consistent with science but not derived from science. Yet I would say the same can be said for many theistic views.

In fact, Dawkins' worldview at times relies on "the science of the gaps" (a phrase I loved that Robertson uses a few times) in theories that sound as much science fiction as science and therefore are as much faith based as Christian doctrines - parallel universes and alien implantation of life on earth and so forth.

In the final analysis, I think theists and atheists tend to bring presuppositions to the table before looking at the evidence. The same evidence leads one man to say "there is no god" and another to say "the heavens are telling the glory of God."

No one book, whether Dawkins' or Robertson's, is going to lay the knock-out blow to the opposing view. But Robertson's book certainly shows that atheist presuppositions and arguments are open to serious criticism, all too often of precisely the same criticisms that are used by atheists against Christianity.