Have
you ever wondered why the Four Gospels refer many times to "the Kingdom
of God" (or "the Kingdom of heaven" in Matthew) while they only mention
the church a few times, whereas Acts and the Letters from the apostles
mention the church many times and the Kingdom of God is seldom
mentioned? In fact "Kingdom of God" or "Kingdom of heaven" is mentioned
in 83 verses in the Gospels and in only 14 other verses in the rest of
the New Testament. "Church" on the other hand is mentioned in only two
verses in the Gospels, but in 71 verses in the rest of the New
Testament.
Why
the massive switch from a "Kingdom" focus in Jesus' ministry in the
Gospels to a "Church" focus in the ministry of the apostles?
And what exactly is the difference is between the Church and the Kingdom (if any)?
Do you think they are two ways of describing the same thing maybe? Is the church the Kingdom of God by another name?
These are the questions we're going to have a quick look at in this post.
The first thing I think we need to sort out are our definitions. If
we define Church and Kingdom correctly this will help us establish the
similarities and differences between the two and enable us to answer
some of our questions.
A
reasonable definition of “Kingdom of God” is: all spheres on earth
where God’s reign and rule (or God’s government) is accepted and
embraced. The Kingdom of God is already in existence through Christ,
though the fullness of the Kingdom still lies in the future. On the
other hand, a reasonable short definition of “Church” is: the community
of all who have faith in Jesus Christ.
It
is clear therefore that though there is a close relationship between
Church and Kingdom, they are not the same thing. The Kingdom of God is not
a synonym for the Church. The Kingdom of God – or God’s sovereign reign
and rule – is an idea or concept, a state of being, a way of viewing
life and the world, and a goal towards which all of history is building
and moving and which Christ lived and worked to bring about. The Church
is the people who are committed to following Christ, and in so doing
they are people who accept the Kingdom idea and work for its growth and
further realisation in history.
If
we were to put it in military terms, the Church might be compared to a
country's army and Christ might be compared to country’s leader and the
army’s commander-in-chief. In those terms, the Kingdom of God would be both the
goal or objective of the war and the totality of the territory or
people where the war aims have already been established and accepted.
The
Kingdom of God is therefore both a different and a much wider concept
than the Church. The Kingdom includes every area of life that is under
the rule and authority of God. If God rules in a person’s life, they are
in the Kingdom. If God rules a home, it is part of the Kingdom. Where a
business is run on biblical principles, it is also part of the Kingdom.
The Kingdom of God includes every human activity that is done according
to his will. And God intends his Kingdom to grow and expand into every
facet and area of life.
This
expansion can take place either as a person enters the Kingdom as a new
citizen through faith in Jesus (the Bible calls this being “born again”
into the Kingdom) or as Kingdom citizens bring different parts of their
lives under the will of God. As we have seen this can include personal relationships, family
life, work, hobbies and leisure activities, political and civic life,
art and cultural life, as well as, of course, spiritual and church life. The Kingdom of God becomes a present reality when a sphere of life is ruled according to the Word of God.
The
Church’s role is to work to help build the Kingdom. One of the problems
of our time is that rather than seeing the Church (the community of
believers) existing to help with the Kingdom project, there is a
tendency to see the Church existing for its own benefit and for its own
growth. And rather than the Church being the Kingdom vanguard in the
world, often it has become a spiritual retreat from the world. What’s
wrong with that? Well, to go back to our military analogy, it would be
like working to recruit and train for the army as an end in itself,
rather than as a precursor to going into battle and making the King's
war objectives a reality!
The
community of Christ’s people is critical to the God’s Kingdom project,
but it is a huge mistake to confuse the project with the personnel. The
Church must never be an end in itself. It must always be working to
establish the kingdom of God. When Jesus comes back he does not just
want to find a holy Church, but a Church that has established the
kingdom of God as a reality in the world.
So
why did the apostles switch focus from the Kingdom to the Church? I
think the answer is that once Christ had inaugurated the Kingdom, the
focus had to switch from the concept and project to the establishment of
the people through whom the Kingdom project would be continued. That is
not to say that the apostles’ forgot about the Kingdom. Quite the
opposite – they realised that the Church had to be established to
advance the Kingdom, just as an army must be recruited and trained
before it can implement the King’s war objectives. There can be no
Kingdom of God without the Church, so the Church is the focus of the
apostles, but even then, not as an end in itself, but as the divinely
appointed agent to work with him for the Kingdom.
