The following is the text of a sermon preached at the Evening Service on 18 May 2008. It has been lightly-edited for publication. The chapter on this verse in J C Ryle's classic work on the Christian life Holiness provided a lot of the material for this sermon.
We gather here tonight one week after Pentecost, that wonderful miraculous day when the Holy Spirit was poured out on Christ’s church, and we gather as part of Christ’s church. We also gather knowing that the highest court of our own denomination, the General Assembly is meeting in Edinburgh this week, and that our own minister, Howard, is going to play his part in making the decisions that will affect the church this year and perhaps for many years to come.
And so on a night like this, we look not at this or that Christian writer’s latest book on “How to do Church” nor do we look at reports of this or that General Assembly committee, but we turn instead to some words about the Church that come from higher authority than even the General Assembly. We turn to again at part of what our Lord Jesus Christ, the King and Head of the Church, himself taught about the Church in Matthew 16:18 where we find the words we are going to concentrate on this evening:
“And on this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
There are five things for us to have a look at in these words of Christ tonight.
There is a building: “My Church.”
There is a builder: Jesus Christ says “I will build my Church.”
There is a foundation: “On this rock I will build”
There is opposition and danger: “The gates of hell”
And there is the promise of safety and security: “The gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
So first, there is a building: “My Church.” Before any of the rest of this verse can be properly understood, it is crucial that we understand what this building, the Church is. It is a very special kind of building you see. It is a building not made of bricks or stone or marble or wood. It is a temple, but not one built by human hands, not one we can see standing on the earth. There is no cathedral, no temple, no chapel, no church building that you can see anywhere in the world and point to it or photograph it on holiday and say of it: “You see that place? That is the Church Christ is talking about in this verse.
No, the building being talked about by Jesus here, the building that he calls “my Church” is a great company of men, women and children. It is a spiritual building consisting of everyone who believes in the Lord Jesus Christ.
The word usually translated “Church” in English bibles here is the Greek word Ekklesia. And that’s a very interesting word. Literally it means “A Calling out” in the sense of people being called out to form “a gathering” or “an Assembly”. The Church is a group of people.
When William Tyndale first translated the New Testament he translated this verse as: “And
upon this rock I will build my congregation: and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
The New Jerusalem Bible translates it: "And on this rock I will build my community. And the gates of the underworld can never overpower it."
So this Church that Christ talks about is a congregation or community of people, not a collection of buildings or any human institution calling itself a church. It is not any particular denomination or branch of the church. It is not the Church of Scotland, or the Free Church of Scotland, or the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland, or the Episcopal Church, or the Methodist Church, the Baptist Church or any Charismatic Church. And it is certainly not the Russian or Greek Orthodox Churches or the Roman Catholic Church. None of these bodies are the “My Church” that Christ referred to, though any and probably all of have members who are part of the church Christ refers to here.
The Church in this verse consists of all true believers in the Lord Jesus Christ. It consists of all of God’s elect. It is the body of Christ, the flock of Good Shepherd, the Bride of the Lamb. It is the “one holy, Catholic and Apostolic church” that the Nicene Creed talks about.
It includes everyone who has repented of sin, and turned to Christ in faith. This membership of this Church is made up of all who have been washed in Christ’s blood, all who have been clothed in Christ’s righteousness, all who have been born again and sanctified by Christ’s Spirit.
J C Ryle says of it: “The Church of our text is one that makes far less show than any visible church in the eyes of men, but it is of far more importance in the eyes of God.” (Holiness, p.211).
All the denominations, groups and fellowships we find in the world are visible churches. They are all human institutions to some extent, and they are all imperfect manifestations of Christ’s own church to some extent. But the Church of this verse is invisible, and it is not a human institution. It is an assembly or gathering of people from all over the world and throughout all of human history who form the covenant people of God, the people he chose, the people he saves, the people who have faith in him and follow him as their Lord.
J C Ryle gives an illustration of the difference between the various visible churches in the world and the one true, but invisible church made up of God’s chosen people who live by faith in Christ. He says that the visible churches of this world, be they Presbyterian, Episcopalian, Independent, Baptist, Charismatic, Reformed or Methodist are “the scaffolding behind which the great building is carried on.” The denominations are the scaffolding around the true Church of Christ, which is being built in the background.
Think of a mighty cathedral shrouded in scaffolding and plastic sheeting. The scaffolding is what is visible, but it is not itself the building being built. It is merely what can be seen, while within and behind the scaffolding, the real building work is going on. I think that’s a brilliant illustration. All this that we see around us, is merely scaffolding, while the real building work of saving souls and rescuing lives, of drawing men and women into a living covenant relationship with God and with fellow Christians is slowly, silently, relentlessly going on in the background.
The great congregation of the redeemed is the Church Christ talks about in this verse. Outside of this church, the body of Jesus Christ, the faithful congregation of all believers, there is no salvation.
Second, there is a builder: Jesus Christ. “I will build my Church…” says Christ. No one else can or will build it for him. He must build it with his own hands.
The prophet Zechariah said of the coming Messiah in Zechariah 6:12-13:
“Thus says the LORD of hosts, "Behold, the man whose name is the Branch: for he shall branch out from his place, and he shall build the temple of the LORD. It is he who shall build the temple of the LORD and shall bear royal honor, and shall sit and rule on his throne. And there shall be a priest on his throne, and the counsel of peace shall be between them both."
The Messiah will build the temple of the LORD. Not one part of the Church can be built without his work and his blessing.
It is Christ who calls the members of the Church to leave the world’s way and follow him. It is Christ who breathes spiritual life into sinners who were by nature dead in trespasses and sins. It is Christ who washes away their sins. It is Christ who gives them peace. It is Christ who gives them eternal life. It is Christ who grants them the gifts of repentance and faith. It is Christ who enables them to become God’s children.
He is the Alpha and Omega, the Author and Perfecter of faith. He is the life. He is the King and Head. From Him every part of the mystical body of Christians is supplied with all they need. Through Him they are strengthened for duty. By Him they are kept from falling. He preserves them to the end, and presents them faultless before the Father’s throne with exceeding great joy. He is all in all to all believers.
It is true that he does often carry on his work through subordinates, through human beings. He works through the preaching of his word, through the circulation and reading of the Scriptures, through Christian literature, through providential circumstances, through prayer, through church discipline, through fellowship and human friendships, through evangelism and mission. He works through all these things, but it is always Christ who is at work to build his Church.
Preachers preach, theologians write and discuss, but only the Lord Jesus Christ can build his Church. Not TV evangelists, not Popes, not even General Assemblies. Christ alone builds it.
Christ is the builder because of who he is and what he has done for his people. And that leads us to the next part of this verse.
Third, there is a foundation that Christ builds his Church on. “And on this rock I will build my Church.”
This is the most controversial part of this verse. There have been many different views put forward for what this foundation is that Christ will build on. The Roman Catholic Church of course say that the Church is built on the foundation of St Peter, the first pope, and on all the popes who have succeeded him to the office of Bishop of Rome. I don’t think it is too strong to say that such a view is totally without biblical warrant. Even if you interpret the verse to mean that Christ will build his church on the witness and work of the apostles and on Peter as the leading apostle, there is no way this verse can be used to justify the papacy. There’s no way these verses can be wrested to mean that. But actually, I don’t think that Christ was saying he would build his church on Peter at all.
Jesus says, “You are Peter and on this rock I will build my Church.” Notice that Christ did not say, “You are Peter and on you I will build my church.” And the rest of the New Testament does not give any real support for this either. Although we have two letters written by Peter in the New Testament, much more of the New Testament was written by John and especially by the apostle Paul for example. And far from being the infallible leader that the Church could be built on, though Peter was transformed by Christ and was one of the first leaders of the church, he was not perfect. He got things wrong. In Galatians 2:11, Paul says:
“But when Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him in public, because he was clearly wrong.”
Now of course “Peter” means rock and so that’s why the Catholic Church have used this verse to justify the doctrine of papal supremacy and papal succession. In effect they say that the verse says: “You are rock and on this rock I will build my Church.” But it’s very interesting when you look at the actual Greek words of our verse because two different words are used for “rock” in the sentence. Christ calls Peter “Petros” which is a masculine word referring to a stone or small rock, but when he says that he will build his church on “this rock” he uses the different word “Petra” which is a feminine word, referring to a large mass of rock, like a cliff or a mountain.
Also, it seems to me that Peter cannot be the foundation upon which the Church is built, because of what Paul says in 1 Corinthians 3:11:
“For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.”
I believe Christ’s meaning is properly conveyed if we translated the verse as “You are a stone, and on this rock I will build my church.” I believe what he meant was really “You are Peter – a little rock – but on the immovable rock of the truth that you have confessed – I will build my Church.” In other words, I think this verse teaches that Christ builds his Church on the truth of Peter’s confession, on the doctrine that Jesus is God’s Messiah and the Son of the Living God. These two truths lie at the heart of the Christian message, the gospel.
I agree with J C Ryle: “It was not Peter, the erring, unstable man, but the mighty truth which the Father had revealed to Peter. It was the truth concerning Jesus Christ Himself which was the rock. It was Christ’s mediatorship, and Christ’s Messiahship. It was the blessed truth that Jesus was the promised Saviour, the true Surety, the real Intercessor between God and man. This was the rock, and this the foundation, upon which the Church of Christ was to be built.”
When read in this light, we see that the rock solid foundation upon which the Church is built is not any person, not even the apostles personally, but on the truths concerning Jesus Christ that the apostles taught. This ties in much better with the rest of the New Testament and with other parts of Christ’s own teaching. For example in Matthew 7:24:
“Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock.”
The gospel message that Christ is God’s chosen King and the Redeemer of his people is, I believe, the rock, upon which Christ builds his church.
Fourth, there is opposition and danger. Christ says that “the gates of hell” will try to oppose the Church that Christ builds.
In Bible times, cities were surrounded by walls. The gates by which they were entered were the principal places for holding courts, transacting business, and deliberating on public matters. The gates were where people made their plans, drew up their designs, negotiated deals and so on. The “gates of hell” it seems to me, refers to the plans and designs of Satan and his hellish minions against God and his purposes. The “gates of hell” are Satan’s evil plans against the Church.
It seems to me that the expression “the gates of hell” is a way of describing the spiritual forces in the heavenly realms that Paul mentions in Ephesians 6:12:
“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.”
The Puritan commentator Matthew Henry wrote:
“The gates of hell are the powers and policies of the devil's kingdom, the dragon's head and horns, by which he makes war with the Lamb; all that comes out of hell-gates, as being hatched and contrived there. These fight against the church by opposing gospel truths, corrupting gospel ordinances, persecuting good ministers and good Christians; drawing or driving, persuading by craft or forcing by cruelty, to that which is inconsistent with the purity of religion; this is the design of the gates of hell, to root out the name of Christianity.”
History shows that Christ was correct in his view that the gates of hell – the powers of darkness – will always keep on trying to destroy his people. Such has been the case throughout history – both Old and New Testaments, and throughout this present gospel age. And the opposition and Satanic persecution of Christ’s people will go on until the end of the age.
The history of the Church, in all periods of history, is a story of conflict and war. This war between good and evil, between the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of this world, has been going on since the beginning when Satan rebelled against God. It is one of the central and recurring threads that runs through the entire Bible. As far back as Genesis 3:15 we get the first glimpse of the war between Christ and Satan and between God’s people and Satan’s followers:
“I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel."
That was true then and it is true now. The Church is always under attack by Satan. He hates Christ’s Church more than anything, except maybe the Holy Trinity. He hates us with an undying and virulent hatred. He is always stirring up opposition and trouble for Christians. The Church is the pillar of the truth and the guardian of the holy gospel that is able to make men wise unto salvation, and so Satan never tires of seeking to prevent the Church from spreading the gospel message and witnessing to Son of the living God to the world.
As J C Ryle says:
“Warfare with the powers of hell has been the experience of the whole body of Christ for six thousand years.”
There is no peace treaty between heaven and hell. The Church is always at war, never at peace with the world or the Prince of this world. It is always at war, always militant, always fighting. Its battle never ends. As Martin Luther said:
“Cain will go on murdering Abel as long as the Church is on the earth.”
Satanic opposition can come in hundreds of different ways. There can be direct assaults of course. There can be false teachers, heretics, who are thrown into the church lives wolves among sheep, to confound and confuse God’s saints with false doctrine and wrong teaching on how we should live.
But sometimes Satan’s opposition can be far more subtle. In fact I would say usually Satan’s opposition is far more subtle.
Do you ever get the feeling that when you try to get close to God or decide you’re going to do something for God, that you suddenly start to have problems you never had before? I know I do. It’s no accident that when I’m getting ready to take a service that’s precisely the time I seem to get a cold, or get toothache, or have something happen that distracts me from my purpose. It’s no accident that when a church decides it’s really going to concentrate on mission and outreach that it suddenly finds it’s members under attack from illnesses, bereavements, family problems, trouble in the workplace, falling out with friends. Satan doesn’t fight clean and fair. He fights dirty. And when Christians decide they are really going to live committed lives to their Lord and Saviour, Satan will do anything he can to stop that from happening.
That’s the gates of hell trying to rise up and stop us from being effective, obedient, loyal Christians.
But far from being surprised or scared when such things happen to us, actually we should expect it and rejoice when such opposition or persecution comes our way, for it means we are on the right track in our Christian lives. A church which faces no opposition or Satanic attack should be the one that is scared, not a church which does face the gates of hell rising against it.
Remember Christ’s words when such opposition comes and take heart. This is Matthew 5:10-12, part of the Beatitudes:
“Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.”
And then also think about these words in 1 Peter 4:12-14:
“Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ's sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed. If you are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you.”
Things happen to us in life. Not everything is plain sailing. We go through hard times of suffering and loss and pain. Or we go through times of being mistrusted, disliked, mocked, and even hated because we have faith in Jesus Christ. The gates of hell are real and I don’t think there’s any Christian who is immune from such attack. It happens to us all.
Fifth, there is Christ’s promise of security and safety for his Church. “I will build my Church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it.”
Take heart, Christians! Because as well as Christ’s warning about the gates of hell, there is also a promise that Christ makes to us in this verse, a promise all of us need to cling to and remember. Yes, the gates of hell will try to rise up and destroy us, but they cannot and will not succeed. The forces of evil will do battle with the Church, but they will never prevail against it. They will fight, but they cannot win. That is Christ’s promise to each and every Christian believer.
Have you ever thought about the emblem that came to symbolise the Presbyterian and Reformed Churches throughout Europe? It’s still the symbol used on the badge of the Church of Scotland to this day. It’s the burning bush. The first impression might be that this is a very strange symbol to choose. But actually it’s highly appropriate, not only because it symbolises God’s presence with this covenant people, but because that bush is always in the flames, always under fiery attack, but not consumed, never destroyed. “I will build my Church and the gates of hell will not prevail against it.”
Only Christ’s church receives this promise from its King and Head. Other empires and earthly kingdoms rise and fall in human history. Think of the once mighty empires of the Persians, the Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Vikings. Think of, in more recent times, the great empires of France and Britain. None of these earthly powers has stood the test of time. But Christ’s church stands and grows for ever. “The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdom of our God and of his Christ” as the Book of Revelation says.
The promise does not apply to all visible churches in this world however. In New Testament times there were churches all over the Middle East and what is now modern day Turkey. Today, few of those churches remain in existence. In Bridgeton there used to be six or more churches in the area now covered by this one parish church. Individual churches can disappear and close. This is especially true of churches that depart from Christ’s teaching, from the faith that was once delivered to the saints. Christ warned the seven churches to whom letters were sent at the start of the Book of Revelation that if they did not pay heed to what the Spirit was saying to the churches, Christ would remove their lampstand from its place – in other words remove his presence and the light of his glory from them – so they would cease to be churches at all. So, although the promise does not apply to every individual church, especially churches that are not faithful to Christ in their teaching and service, the promise does apply to Christ’s own church, to the great congregation of true believers in him. Against them, the gates of hell cannot prevail.
Even if Satan stirs up persecution so that Christians lose their lives, the gates of hell shall not prevail against this Church, because for Christian martyrs, death is only a doorway into Christ’s presence and eternal blessedness in heaven.
No matter what the enemies of the church do, whether they be worldly rulers, enemies within the church, or the cosmic forces of evil that work behind our human enemies, God’s people, God’s church shall never be overthrown. We have Christ’s own promise for that.
As the apostle Paul says in 2 Corinthians 4:8-10:
“We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed; always carrying in the body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be manifested in our bodies.”
We can go through the mill in our sufferings. God sometimes puts us right into furnace with its blistering heat and searing pain. God puts us through it, but never without a good reason, there is always a purpose behind it, even if we cannot begin to imagine what it could be.
Romans 8:28: “And we know that God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose.”
In the 19th century, French troops liberated the prison of the Holy Inquisition in Rome. In one of the cells, a prisoner – probably a Protestant who had been excommunicated from the Church of Rome – had scratched some words on the walls. They read: “Blessed Jesus, they cannot cast me out of Thy true Church.” Not one single believer can be snatched out of Christ’s hand by the Devil and all his minions however hard they try.
The question each of us must consider tonight is whether we are truly members of Christ’s Church. Not members of the Church of Scotland – for that membership can save no man or woman. But members of the body of Christ, part of Christ’s great congregation who trust and follow him and for whom he died to redeem and save. For membership in that Church guarantees salvation.
“And on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it.”
Monday, 26 May 2008
Friday, 2 May 2008
Divorce and Remarriage in the Church
Divorce and Remarriage in the Church: Biblical Solutions for Pastoral Realities
by David Instone-Brewer
Paternoster Press 2003
This is an important Christian book on the sensitive and controversial subject of divorce and remarriage. It is not exaggerating to say that if David Instone-Brewer's interpretation of the biblical texts is correct, then the Church's traditional interpretations of the grounds for divorce and prohibition of remarriage are in need of major revision.
In the opinion of this reviewer, Instone-Brewer's argument provides a biblically consistent, pastorally caring, legally realistic and genuinely loving and fair road map through one of the most difficult areas of practical theology.
Most Protestants recognise the need for divorce and remarriage in the fallen and imperfect world we all inhabit. Many theologians come up with interpretative schemes that try to take the biblical texts seriously while providing practical solutions to real life situations. I think the position in the Westminster Confession, for example, is like this. It allows for remarriage after divorce by treating the "offending party" in the divorce "as if they were dead", and hence the marriage bond is completely severed. However, there is little real biblical justification for saying that a party in a divorce should be treated in law as if dead. It is, however, a practical solution to the issue.
Likewise, many theologians and pastors will take Paul's exception of "desertion" in a wider context than purely physical abandonment to include situations where there has been moral desertion, such as physical, mental or severe emotional abuse. Others have widened a strict reading of Paul to include the situation where a professing believer deserts his or her spouse on the reasoning that such a person can be treated as a unbeliever if they will not be reconciled to their spouse.
From the time of the Reformation, there have been theologians who argued that because on any reading, the New Testament seems to allow for divorce for adultery and desertion, it must be right by good and necessary consequence that divorce be permitted for worse sins than adultery or desertion, such as physical or sexual abuse.
All these practical solutions are attempts to respect the biblical texts while recognising that a strictly literalistic interpretation of what those texts is extremely difficult for real life pastoral situations. There is also a feeling in many people that such interpretations - which would, to give an extreme example, require a Christian wife to remain married to a husband who was physically torturing her everyday as long as he lives with her and does not commit adultery - are not consistent with the Christian gospel or with God's attributes of love, mercy, compassion and justice that we are to mirror in our lives.
The triumph, it seems to this reviewer, of Dr Instone-Brewer's position is that it works naturally with the biblical texts when interpreted in their original context rather than finding ways which frankly look like they are trying to get around the texts (at least in their most restricted interpretation). Instone-Brewer provides good and just solutions to the issue of divorce backed up by solid scholarship on the social and religious background of the first century world that the New Testament was originally written for.
The author has been criticised for making divorce too easy, but this is certainly not what he advocates.
He summarises his conclusions as follows:
For a covenant theologian like myself, who believes in the essential continuity of the old and new administrations of the one Covenant of Grace, the fact that this view does not drive a wedge between divorce in the Old Testament and divorce in the New Testament (which the traditional interpretation of the New Testament texts does), is also an attractive feature of this argument. Indeed it has always seemed strange that the traditional view necessitates the New Testament being somewhat more strict, more rigorous, more legalistic than the more practical and gracious provisions of the Old Testament which recognises human weakness in a fallen world. Dr Instone-Brewer's argument actually removes this apparent anomaly by showing how the New Testament texts grow out of the Old Testament texts rather than being a radical break with them.
This book is written for the general reader and the busy pastor. The exegesis and background history are concise and to the point. Dr Instone-Brewer has also written a much larger book which incorporates far more of his research in this area of biblical studies. The other book is entitled Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible: The Social and Literary Context. This reviewer definitely plans to read the larger book at some point in the future.
Note: Both of Dr Instone-Brewer's books are available to read online at his website
http://www.divorceremarriage.com/
by David Instone-Brewer
Paternoster Press 2003
This is an important Christian book on the sensitive and controversial subject of divorce and remarriage. It is not exaggerating to say that if David Instone-Brewer's interpretation of the biblical texts is correct, then the Church's traditional interpretations of the grounds for divorce and prohibition of remarriage are in need of major revision.
In the opinion of this reviewer, Instone-Brewer's argument provides a biblically consistent, pastorally caring, legally realistic and genuinely loving and fair road map through one of the most difficult areas of practical theology.
Most Protestants recognise the need for divorce and remarriage in the fallen and imperfect world we all inhabit. Many theologians come up with interpretative schemes that try to take the biblical texts seriously while providing practical solutions to real life situations. I think the position in the Westminster Confession, for example, is like this. It allows for remarriage after divorce by treating the "offending party" in the divorce "as if they were dead", and hence the marriage bond is completely severed. However, there is little real biblical justification for saying that a party in a divorce should be treated in law as if dead. It is, however, a practical solution to the issue.
Likewise, many theologians and pastors will take Paul's exception of "desertion" in a wider context than purely physical abandonment to include situations where there has been moral desertion, such as physical, mental or severe emotional abuse. Others have widened a strict reading of Paul to include the situation where a professing believer deserts his or her spouse on the reasoning that such a person can be treated as a unbeliever if they will not be reconciled to their spouse.
From the time of the Reformation, there have been theologians who argued that because on any reading, the New Testament seems to allow for divorce for adultery and desertion, it must be right by good and necessary consequence that divorce be permitted for worse sins than adultery or desertion, such as physical or sexual abuse.
All these practical solutions are attempts to respect the biblical texts while recognising that a strictly literalistic interpretation of what those texts is extremely difficult for real life pastoral situations. There is also a feeling in many people that such interpretations - which would, to give an extreme example, require a Christian wife to remain married to a husband who was physically torturing her everyday as long as he lives with her and does not commit adultery - are not consistent with the Christian gospel or with God's attributes of love, mercy, compassion and justice that we are to mirror in our lives.
The triumph, it seems to this reviewer, of Dr Instone-Brewer's position is that it works naturally with the biblical texts when interpreted in their original context rather than finding ways which frankly look like they are trying to get around the texts (at least in their most restricted interpretation). Instone-Brewer provides good and just solutions to the issue of divorce backed up by solid scholarship on the social and religious background of the first century world that the New Testament was originally written for.
The author has been criticised for making divorce too easy, but this is certainly not what he advocates.
He summarises his conclusions as follows:
- The Bible's message for those suffering within marriage is both realistic and loving
- Marriage should be lifelong, but broken marriage vows can be grounds for divorce
- Biblical grounds for divorce include adultery, abuse and abandonment
- Jesus urged forgiveness but allowed divorce for repeated unrepentant breaking of marriage vows
- Only the victim, not the perpetrator of such sins, should decide when or whether to divorce
- Anyone who divorces on biblical grounds or who is divorced against their will can remarry.
For a covenant theologian like myself, who believes in the essential continuity of the old and new administrations of the one Covenant of Grace, the fact that this view does not drive a wedge between divorce in the Old Testament and divorce in the New Testament (which the traditional interpretation of the New Testament texts does), is also an attractive feature of this argument. Indeed it has always seemed strange that the traditional view necessitates the New Testament being somewhat more strict, more rigorous, more legalistic than the more practical and gracious provisions of the Old Testament which recognises human weakness in a fallen world. Dr Instone-Brewer's argument actually removes this apparent anomaly by showing how the New Testament texts grow out of the Old Testament texts rather than being a radical break with them.
This book is written for the general reader and the busy pastor. The exegesis and background history are concise and to the point. Dr Instone-Brewer has also written a much larger book which incorporates far more of his research in this area of biblical studies. The other book is entitled Divorce and Remarriage in the Bible: The Social and Literary Context. This reviewer definitely plans to read the larger book at some point in the future.
Note: Both of Dr Instone-Brewer's books are available to read online at his website
http://www.divorceremarriage.com/
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)